In The News › Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans makes final pitch for drainage-tax renewal before election

Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans makes final pitch for drainage-tax renewal before election

By Robert Morris

Uptown Messenger

Dec. 2, 2016

With barely more than a week before the Dec. 10 election, officials with the Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans are making their final effort to spread the word about voting to renew a tax that provides the agency with a third of its budget for draining the city.

For voters in New Orleans, the short ballot on the Dec. 10 election will include runoffs in the U.S. Senate race and a local judicial seat, as well as two tax questions — whether to create a new tax to repay the city’s obligation to the firefighters’ pension, and whether to renew a property tax that pays for the S&WB drainage services.

The S&WB has three functions, each with its own, separate funding source, General Superintendent Joe Becker explained to the Audubon Riverside Neighborhood Association on Thursday evening. Water and sewer services are each paid for by their respective fees on residents’ monthly bills, Becker said, but the drainage system across the city of New Orleans is paid for by a series of property taxes that raise about $50 million annually.

One of those taxes that generates roughly $15 million of that total is set to expire at the end of the year, unless residents vote to renew it on Dec. 10. The property tax is actually a slight reduction — from 4.66 mills now to 4.46 mills starting next year — and costs about $125 per year for a home valued at $350,000, he said.

“If it doesn’t pass on Dec. 10, then for Jan. 1 there’s going to be an immediate $15 million hit on our drainage budget,” Becker said.

If it fails, residents may not notice that small of a reduction in their property taxes, Becker said — but they will notice the decrease in drainage service. If the tax fails, the drainage budget will be cut by a nearly a third — primarily in maintenance, such as reducing the grass cutting and debris removal from the open drainage canals, Becker said. Over time, the agency will have to cut its 250 to 300 employees and contractors in the drainage division by a third as well, he said.

The drainage system is unique in the world, and can remove an inch of rainfall from city streets in the first hour, followed by a half an inch every subsequent hour. Together, the 120 pumps at 24 pumping stations could fill a swimming pool in 1.5 seconds, and many areas of the city — such as Lakeview and New Orleans East — are habitable specifically because of this pumping capacity.

“Nowhere else on the planet do they have a drainage system that compares to what the Sewerage and Water Board is providing the city of New Orleans,” Becker said. “We need it. We get more rain that just about anywhere in the country. We’re below sea level, and we’re surrounded by water. … The footprint of the city of New Orleans today is dependent on the drainage system the S&WB is operating.”

Audubon Riverside is the latest neighborhood group to get a visit from Becker as he seeks to spread the word about the importance of tax. He made a similar pitch to the Delachaise Neighborhood Association in November, and said he has personally visited with about a dozen different neighborhoods, while executive director Cedric Grant has visited about a half dozen more. They’ve also visited university groups and engineering firms, trying to enlist their help in convincing the public to renew the tax, he said.

While the Audubon Riverside board members had their own concerns about the efficacy of the S&WB in some respects — especially in how difficult it can be to get information about the status of repair jobs — all of those present agreed that renewing the drainage tax is important. With their support, Becker noted, they join endorsements from the Bureau of Governmental Research as well as the Times-Picayune, The Advocate and Gambit newspapers.

“Living in New Orleans, I’m probably generally in favor of drainage,” said Audubon Riverside Neighborhood Association president John Chappell. “For me, it’s kind of a no-brainer.”

Most of the groups that Becker has spoken to have been likewise receptive, he said, but he is concerned about the people who will walk into the voting booth, see “tax” and vote “no” without considering what the money is used for.

“We’re very concerned because we think the deck is kind of stacked against us. People are paying a lot of taxes, and they don’t like paying taxes,” Becker says. “I want as many people as possible voting, but I want them to understand what they’re voting for.”

Fair Use Notice

This site occasionally reprints copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues and to highlight the accomplishments of our affiliates. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is available without profit. For more information go to: US CODE: Title 17,107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.