In The News › N.O. sheriff, mayor both support plan to shift money for courtroom fix

N.O. sheriff, mayor both support plan to shift money for courtroom fix

By John Simerman

The Advocate

October 6, 2014

Orleans Parish voters who agreed in 2000 to tax themselves for $27 million in criminal justice projects probably never figured that a chunk of the work would remain undone 14 years later.

But that’s how things stand with two courtrooms that were slated to replace cramped attic quarters in the criminal courthouse, where a pint-sized freight lift is the only way up for those who can’t make a steep flights of stairs.

About $6.9 million is still earmarked for the project from a bond fund controlled by Sheriff Marlin Gusman, the lone trustee of the Orleans Parish Law Enforcement District.

But if the city has its way, that money won’t be spent on the courtrooms after all. Instead, Mayor Mitch Landrieu’s administration is aiming to tap unused FEMA money for that project.

The move is aimed at allowing Gusman to have more money for jail reforms without breaking the city’s bank, assuming voters on Nov. 4 approve another tax measure for the law enforcement district, Chief Administrator Andy Kopplin acknowledged in a recent interview.

The plan to tap FEMA funds — at the expense of other public safety projects they might bankroll — amounts to a juggling act by the city in its scramble to fund the demands of a federal consent decree forcing Gusman to provide more and better care for inmates housed in his troubled jail.

State law requires the city to pay for inmate care, making Landrieu and Gusman awkward fiscal bedfellows amid their legal wrangling over jail costs.

The plan assumes voters will pass a measure that would keep taxes level at the 2.9 mills now assessed from another, 2008 bond measure for criminal justice projects, also controlled by the district.

The new measure would extend the tax and shift Gusman’s use of the funds beyond capital projects. Voter approval would mean that after debt payments on the current bond, Gusman could spend the rest on “the operation, maintenance and upkeep of jails and related facilities.”

The tax would generate about $5 million in its first year, according to a recent report by the Bureau of Governmental Research, which supports the measure. As the capital debt falls, the money available for operations is slated to increase.

Kopplin said the administration is looking at other capital projects that it might also be able to finance using unspent FEMA monies, including about $4.5 million to help finish the coroner’s complex now under construction.

FEMA hasn’t yet approved the two plans, and if the plans fail, Kopplin said the funding would revert back to the law enforcement district. It’s unclear how much additional annual revenue for sheriff’s operations those moves would generate.

Kopplin made clear that Landrieu supports the ballot measure regardless.

“We have the ability to increase the benefit of it by using some of the resources the city has to finish projects like the courthouse renovation,” Kopplin said.

“You can see why it’s in the city’s interest to use its capital funds to finish projects that otherwise would be funded by the law enforcement district. We think this makes a whole lot of sense for a variety of reasons.”

It also has the benefit of being legal, according to lawyers for the city and the sheriff’s bond counsel, Kopplin said.

He insisted that voters who passed the measure with 69 percent of the vote in 2000 are still getting what they wanted.

City officials outlined the plan at a meeting last week with the criminal court judges, pledging that the courtrooms will get built one way or another.

“What the voters did was to authorize the sheriff to issue debt for a particular project. He can’t issue debt for some other project they didn’t authorize him to do,” Kopplin said. “The voters’ expectation was that the project will be completed.”

BGR President Janet Howard said she didn’t see a problem with the moves proposed by the administration, since she said no bond money is being redirected for other purposes.

“I don’t see that happening,” Howard said. “The voters are authorizing this new millage, approving a use for operational purposes. That’s why it’s not a problem.”

Judicial Administrator Rob Kazik said that after years of planning and a litany of obstacles, the city had finally put the courtroom construction project out to bid, only to pull it back early this year over concerns about an estimator’s role in the process.

“They’ve assured us we’re going to get two new courtrooms out of this, that the project is going to be on schedule,” Kazik said after the meeting this week.

Fair Use Notice

This site occasionally reprints copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues and to highlight the accomplishments of our affiliates. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is available without profit. For more information go to: US CODE: Title 17,107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.